Chinese vs Immigrants from Russia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,965,077 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Russia within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.198. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in Immigrants from Russia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 15.4 Immigrants from Russia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $64,512, a difference of 20.1%), per capita income ($46,098 compared to $52,044, a difference of 12.9%), and median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $63,326, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($116,188 compared to $116,942, a difference of 0.65%), wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $96,378, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 48.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 38.0%), and married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 0.38%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 8.0%), and receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 41.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 23.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 13.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.37%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.38%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 11.4%), family households (68.1% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 7.8%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.80%), divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 83.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 66.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 41.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 7.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 19.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 41.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 42.8%), no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 38.5%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.56%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.57%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 26.6%), male disability (12.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 14.3%), and disability (12.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 0.44%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 2.0%).