Chinese vs Jamaican Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chinese
Jamaican
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chinese
Jamaicans
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
821
SOCIAL INDEX
5.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
337th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Jamaican Integration in Chinese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,727,842 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Jamaicans within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.383. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.113% in Jamaicans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 112.6 Jamaicans.
Chinese vs Jamaican Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Jamaican communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $54,560, a difference of 42.0%), wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 32.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $88,327, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $38,670, a difference of 7.2%), median earnings ($48,836 compared to $43,343, a difference of 12.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $50,929, a difference of 14.2%).
Income Metric | Chinese | Jamaican |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,098 | Tragic $39,231 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $116,188 | Tragic $90,581 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $98,496 | Tragic $76,583 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,836 | Tragic $43,343 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,872 | Tragic $48,632 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,461 | Poor $38,670 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $58,162 | Tragic $50,929 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,264 | Tragic $83,933 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $116,156 | Tragic $88,327 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $77,465 | Tragic $54,560 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.9% | Exceptional 19.6% |
Chinese vs Jamaican Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Jamaican communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (6.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 70.0%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 68.1%), and receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 67.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 12.5%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 20.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 20.7%).
Poverty Metric | Chinese | Jamaican |
Poverty | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 14.4% |
Families | Exceptional 6.5% | Tragic 11.1% |
Males | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 13.2% |
Females | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 15.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 16.2% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 14.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.1% | Tragic 20.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 19.7% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 20.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.3% | Tragic 19.7% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 13.2% |
Single Females | Exceptional 16.1% | Poor 21.6% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 17.3% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 24.6% | Poor 29.9% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.6% | Tragic 6.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 8.3% | Tragic 13.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 9.1% | Tragic 15.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.8% | Tragic 16.4% |
Chinese vs Jamaican Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Jamaican communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 60.0%), female unemployment (4.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 36.6%), and unemployment (4.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 5.6%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 17.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 26.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Chinese | Jamaican |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.3% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.6% |
Females | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 6.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 14.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.0% | Tragic 21.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.5% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 9.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Tragic 8.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 9.8% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.4% |
Chinese vs Jamaican Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Jamaican communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 16.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.30%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.55%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.75%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chinese | Jamaican |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.7% | Poor 64.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.7% | Tragic 78.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.6% | Tragic 33.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.3% | Tragic 72.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.3% | Tragic 83.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Tragic 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.1% | Good 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.1% | Tragic 82.0% |
Chinese vs Jamaican Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Jamaican communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 59.7%), births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 27.2%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 40.9%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.31, a difference of 0.82%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and family households (68.1% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 6.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Chinese | Jamaican |
Family Households | Exceptional 68.1% | Average 64.2% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.0% | Tragic 26.9% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 50.4% | Tragic 40.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.34 | Exceptional 3.31 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Average 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 8.2% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.5% | Tragic 41.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.2% | Tragic 38.5% |
Chinese vs Jamaican Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Jamaican communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 118.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 91.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 56.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 11.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 31.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 56.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chinese | Jamaican |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 17.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.9% | Tragic 82.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.1% | Tragic 45.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.9% | Tragic 15.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.8% | Tragic 4.6% |
Chinese vs Jamaican Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Jamaican communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 63.2%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 21.2%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.99%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.0%).
Education Level Metric | Chinese | Jamaican |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Tragic 2.4% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 97.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 96.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Tragic 95.5% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Tragic 95.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Tragic 94.1% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 92.8% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.6% | Tragic 91.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Tragic 89.7% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Tragic 87.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.0% | Tragic 83.3% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.3% | Tragic 60.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.2% | Tragic 54.9% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.5% | Tragic 42.1% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.5% | Tragic 33.6% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.6% | Tragic 13.4% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.5% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Tragic 1.5% |
Chinese vs Jamaican Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Jamaican communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 37.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 31.8%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.54%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 2.1%).
Disability Metric | Chinese | Jamaican |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 12.1% |
Males | Tragic 12.1% | Poor 11.5% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Tragic 12.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Fair 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Excellent 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 11.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.7% | Poor 24.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.7% | Poor 47.7% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Exceptional 2.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 15.9% | Tragic 17.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 6.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.7% |