Chinese vs Paraguayan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,919,641 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Paraguayans within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.433. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.098% in Paraguayans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 97.8 Paraguayans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Paraguayan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $64,443, a difference of 20.2%), per capita income ($46,098 compared to $50,385, a difference of 9.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $109,447, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 0.32%), median family income ($116,188 compared to $114,016, a difference of 1.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,264 compared to $106,615, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Paraguayan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 41.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 40.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 1.2%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Paraguayan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 47.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 27.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.55%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.81%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Paraguayan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 14.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.34%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Paraguayan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.8%), married-couple households (50.4% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 7.1%), and family households (68.1% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 1.9%), divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Paraguayan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 79.2%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 74.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 44.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 7.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 19.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 44.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Paraguayan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 46.2%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 31.4%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (68.3% compared to 67.9%, a difference of 0.57%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.67%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Paraguayan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 73.2%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 38.4%), and male disability (12.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.85%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 4.8%), and cognitive disability (15.9% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 5.5%).