Chinese vs Immigrants from Romania Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chinese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Romania
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chinese

Immigrants from Romania

Exceptional
Exceptional
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,314
SOCIAL INDEX
90.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
21st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Romania Integration in Chinese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,353,601 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Romania within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.032. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Immigrants from Romania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 5.0 Immigrants from Romania.
Chinese Integration in Immigrants from Romania Communities

Chinese vs Immigrants from Romania Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $64,462, a difference of 20.2%), median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $61,040, a difference of 7.3%), and per capita income ($46,098 compared to $49,463, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,264 compared to $104,713, a difference of 0.43%), median family income ($116,188 compared to $113,434, a difference of 2.4%), and median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $42,718, a difference of 3.0%).
Chinese vs Immigrants from Romania Income
Income MetricChineseImmigrants from Romania
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,098
Exceptional
$49,463
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$116,188
Exceptional
$113,434
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$98,496
Exceptional
$94,222
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,836
Exceptional
$51,337
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$56,872
Exceptional
$61,040
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,461
Exceptional
$42,718
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$58,162
Exceptional
$55,522
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$104,264
Exceptional
$104,713
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$116,156
Exceptional
$110,633
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$77,465
Exceptional
$64,462
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.9%
Tragic
27.0%

Chinese vs Immigrants from Romania Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 31.7%), married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 28.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 0.81%), receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and single male poverty (11.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 6.9%).
Chinese vs Immigrants from Romania Poverty
Poverty MetricChineseImmigrants from Romania
Poverty
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
11.0%
Families
Exceptional
6.5%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Exceptional
8.7%
Exceptional
9.9%
Females
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
12.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
16.2%
Exceptional
18.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.0%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.1%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
14.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
14.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.3%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.0%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Exceptional
16.1%
Exceptional
18.8%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.4%
Exceptional
15.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
24.6%
Exceptional
27.2%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
10.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Good
11.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
10.0%

Chinese vs Immigrants from Romania Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 44.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 21.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.9%).
Chinese vs Immigrants from Romania Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChineseImmigrants from Romania
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Exceptional
4.5%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.7%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.0%
Average
17.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.2%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
5.9%
Excellent
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.8%
Exceptional
7.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Excellent
5.3%

Chinese vs Immigrants from Romania Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.37%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.63%).
Chinese vs Immigrants from Romania Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChineseImmigrants from Romania
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.7%
Excellent
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.7%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.6%
Fair
36.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.3%
Good
75.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.3%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.1%
Exceptional
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.1%
Exceptional
83.3%

Chinese vs Immigrants from Romania Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 8.5%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 6.8%), and family households (68.1% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (49.5% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.2%), divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 4.3%).
Chinese vs Immigrants from Romania Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChineseImmigrants from Romania
Family Households
Exceptional
68.1%
Good
64.6%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.0%
Fair
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
50.4%
Exceptional
48.3%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.34
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.5%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.5%
Exceptional
48.4%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.2%
Exceptional
27.9%

Chinese vs Immigrants from Romania Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 46.7%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 38.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 9.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 26.6%).
Chinese vs Immigrants from Romania Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChineseImmigrants from Romania
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
11.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.9%
Tragic
88.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
60.1%
Fair
54.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.9%
Poor
18.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Poor
6.0%

Chinese vs Immigrants from Romania Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 29.9%), master's degree (14.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 21.3%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.44%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.45%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.45%).
Chinese vs Immigrants from Romania Education Level
Education Level MetricChineseImmigrants from Romania
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Excellent
98.1%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Excellent
98.1%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Excellent
98.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Excellent
98.0%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Excellent
97.9%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
97.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
96.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.9%
Exceptional
96.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.6%
Exceptional
93.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.6%
Exceptional
92.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.0%
Exceptional
90.4%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
89.0%
Exceptional
87.5%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.3%
Exceptional
68.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.2%
Exceptional
63.3%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.5%
Exceptional
50.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Good
38.5%
Exceptional
42.9%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.6%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Average
4.5%
Exceptional
5.4%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Exceptional
2.1%

Chinese vs Immigrants from Romania Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 22.7%), male disability (12.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 12.7%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 0.90%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.91%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 2.0%).
Chinese vs Immigrants from Romania Disability
Disability MetricChineseImmigrants from Romania
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
10.7%
Females
Fair
12.3%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Excellent
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.7%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.7%
Exceptional
46.0%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Average
3.0%
Cognitive
Exceptional
15.9%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Excellent
2.4%