Chinese vs Nigerian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,218,627 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Nigerians within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.768. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 2.695% in Nigerians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 2,694.9 Nigerians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $58,992, a difference of 31.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $95,492, a difference of 21.6%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $81,725, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $39,641, a difference of 4.6%), median earnings ($48,836 compared to $45,532, a difference of 7.3%), and median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $52,039, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (6.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 55.9%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 55.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (11.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 54.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 4.4%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 17.7%), and single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 19.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 63.6%), female unemployment (4.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 28.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 9.1%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 12.2%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 17.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 36.1%, a difference of 7.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.54%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 48.5%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.3%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.29, a difference of 1.5%), family households (68.1% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 6.7%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 47.2%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 46.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 4.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 13.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 28.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 59.2%), associate's degree (48.5% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 7.6%), and college, 1 year or more (62.2% compared to 58.5%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.90%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.91%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 39.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 23.0%), and cognitive disability (15.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 2.1%), female disability (12.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 4.9%).