Immigrants from Nigeria vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 268,503,657 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Immigrant from Nigeria communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.138. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Nigeria within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.042% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Nigeria corresponds to an increase of 41.8 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($86,589 compared to $119,756, a difference of 38.3%), per capita income ($40,339 compared to $54,264, a difference of 34.5%), and median male earnings ($51,310 compared to $67,353, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($58,942 compared to $69,174, a difference of 17.4%), wage/income gap (22.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 17.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($49,174 compared to $57,931, a difference of 17.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (19.0% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 39.4%), child poverty among girls under 16 (18.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 38.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (18.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.1% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 0.56%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.0% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 32.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 27.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.68%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 15.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.9% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.24%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 54.9%), births to unmarried women (35.4% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 43.5%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.49%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.7%), and family households with children (28.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 28.5%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.2% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 3.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.9% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.37%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.9% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 75.9%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 64.8%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 45.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.0% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.0%), 3rd grade (97.3% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.040%), and 5th grade (96.7% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 31.5%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 28.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.4%), disability age over 75 (47.5% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.1%).