Chinese vs Sierra Leonean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 33,008,765 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Sierra Leoneans within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.705. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.041% in Sierra Leoneans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 40.9 Sierra Leoneans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Sierra Leonean communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 20.8%), householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $65,038, a difference of 19.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $102,427, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($48,836 compared to $48,286, a difference of 1.1%), householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $57,272, a difference of 1.5%), and median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $42,868, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Sierra Leonean communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 49.6%), child poverty under the age of 16 (11.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 47.3%), and family poverty (6.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 46.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 11.4%), single father poverty (15.4% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 11.5%), and single male poverty (11.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 15.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Sierra Leonean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 55.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 28.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 7.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 13.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Sierra Leonean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 68.9%, a difference of 6.6%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.44%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Sierra Leonean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 49.8%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 24.6%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.30, a difference of 1.3%), family households (68.1% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 6.7%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Sierra Leonean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 50.4%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 33.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 52.9%, a difference of 13.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 30.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Sierra Leonean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 57.0%), master's degree (14.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 15.2%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.86%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.86%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Sierra Leonean communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 47.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 23.1%), and male disability (12.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.7%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 4.7%).