Chinese vs Arab Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,725,978 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Arabs within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.469. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.220% in Arabs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 219.7 Arabs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Arab communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $62,266, a difference of 24.4%), householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $51,219, a difference of 13.6%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $88,398, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($48,836 compared to $48,599, a difference of 0.49%), median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $57,298, a difference of 0.75%), and per capita income ($46,098 compared to $45,662, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Arab communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 55.0%), family poverty (6.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 41.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 41.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 8.0%), receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 17.6%), and single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 17.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Arab communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 60.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 21.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.75%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Arab communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.79%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Arab communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 16.7%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 8.1%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.23, a difference of 3.4%), divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Arab communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 46.5%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 27.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 9.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 26.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Arab communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 42.6%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 18.7%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.64%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.65%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Arab communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 23.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.5%), and male disability (12.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 2.7%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 3.5%).