Chinese vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,391,337 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.090. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.014% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 13.8 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $60,581, a difference of 27.9%), median household income ($98,496 compared to $84,965, a difference of 15.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $101,387, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $55,382, a difference of 2.7%), median earnings ($48,836 compared to $46,658, a difference of 4.7%), and per capita income ($46,098 compared to $43,806, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (16.1% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 32.1%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 29.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 5.3%), single father poverty (15.4% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 10.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 59.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 19.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.88%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.29%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 17.8%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 14.0%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (49.5% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 1.4%), married-couple households (50.4% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 3.7%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 24.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 9.9%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 0.49%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.50%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 10.1%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 6.1%), and associate's degree (48.5% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (97.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.040%), 8th grade (96.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.060%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 32.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 26.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.7%), male disability (12.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability (12.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 2.5%).