Chinese vs Immigrants from Israel Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chinese
Immigrants from Israel
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chinese
Immigrants from Israel
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,654
SOCIAL INDEX
74.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
109th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Israel Integration in Chinese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,526,404 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.241. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.058% in Immigrants from Israel. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 58.3 Immigrants from Israel.
Chinese vs Immigrants from Israel Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,098 compared to $57,384, a difference of 24.5%), median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $68,716, a difference of 20.8%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $57,034, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $55,913, a difference of 4.0%), median household income ($98,496 compared to $104,090, a difference of 5.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $122,893, a difference of 5.8%).
Income Metric | Chinese | Immigrants from Israel |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,098 | Exceptional $57,384 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $116,188 | Exceptional $127,430 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $98,496 | Exceptional $104,090 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,836 | Exceptional $57,034 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,872 | Exceptional $68,716 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,461 | Exceptional $46,902 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $58,162 | Exceptional $55,913 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,264 | Exceptional $117,219 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $116,156 | Exceptional $122,893 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $77,465 | Exceptional $69,857 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.9% | Tragic 28.2% |
Chinese vs Immigrants from Israel Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 47.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 46.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 2.5%), single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 4.7%), and single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 8.0%).
Poverty Metric | Chinese | Immigrants from Israel |
Poverty | Exceptional 9.5% | Excellent 11.7% |
Families | Exceptional 6.5% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Males | Exceptional 8.7% | Excellent 10.8% |
Females | Exceptional 10.4% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 16.2% | Fair 20.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.0% | Exceptional 12.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.1% | Exceptional 14.9% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 14.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 14.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.3% | Exceptional 14.2% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.0% | Exceptional 12.1% |
Single Females | Exceptional 16.1% | Exceptional 18.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Good 16.1% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 24.6% | Exceptional 26.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.6% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 8.3% | Fair 11.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 9.1% | Tragic 13.3% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.8% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Chinese vs Immigrants from Israel Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 32.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 28.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 3.9%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 5.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Chinese | Immigrants from Israel |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Fair 5.3% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Fair 5.4% |
Females | Exceptional 4.5% | Poor 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 12.0% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.0% | Tragic 18.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 10.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Average 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Average 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Excellent 4.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Tragic 4.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 5.9% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 8.5% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Excellent 5.3% |
Chinese vs Immigrants from Israel Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 26.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.11%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.74%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chinese | Immigrants from Israel |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.7% | Good 65.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.7% | Good 79.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.6% | Tragic 30.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.3% | Tragic 71.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.3% | Fair 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.1% | Good 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.1% | Excellent 83.1% |
Chinese vs Immigrants from Israel Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 20.3%), single father households (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 9.8%), and family households (68.1% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.7%), currently married (49.5% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.22, a difference of 3.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Chinese | Immigrants from Israel |
Family Households | Exceptional 68.1% | Tragic 63.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.0% | Fair 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 50.4% | Exceptional 48.0% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.34 | Fair 3.22 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.5% | Exceptional 48.1% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.2% | Exceptional 25.1% |
Chinese vs Immigrants from Israel Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 89.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 85.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 52.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 8.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 22.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 52.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chinese | Immigrants from Israel |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 15.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.9% | Tragic 84.5% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.1% | Tragic 49.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.9% | Tragic 15.6% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.8% | Tragic 4.8% |
Chinese vs Immigrants from Israel Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 76.0%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 72.7%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 55.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.50%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.51%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.51%).
Education Level Metric | Chinese | Immigrants from Israel |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Excellent 2.0% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Good 98.1% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Good 98.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Good 98.0% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Good 98.0% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Good 97.9% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Good 97.6% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Good 97.5% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Good 97.2% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Good 96.2% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Excellent 96.0% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Excellent 95.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 94.4% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.6% | Exceptional 93.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Exceptional 92.5% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Exceptional 90.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.0% | Exceptional 88.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.3% | Exceptional 72.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.2% | Exceptional 67.8% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.5% | Exceptional 56.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.5% | Exceptional 50.0% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.6% | Exceptional 22.6% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.5% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Exceptional 3.0% |
Chinese vs Immigrants from Israel Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 39.0%), male disability (12.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 26.1%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (15.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 3.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 4.1%), and disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 6.2%).
Disability Metric | Chinese | Immigrants from Israel |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Males | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 0.96% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.7% | Exceptional 19.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.7% | Exceptional 45.9% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 15.9% | Exceptional 16.4% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.4% |