Chinese vs Immigrants from Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,775,112 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.329. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 1.314% in Immigrants from Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 1,313.9 Immigrants from Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $67,594, a difference of 14.6%), median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $63,240, a difference of 11.2%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $53,310, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $116,566, a difference of 0.35%), median household income ($98,496 compared to $99,933, a difference of 1.5%), and median family income ($116,188 compared to $118,291, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 34.6%), married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 32.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.3%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and single father poverty (15.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 40.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 22.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.30%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.94%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 13.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.50%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 12.9%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 10.9%), and single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.27, a difference of 2.2%), currently married (49.5% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 32.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 30.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 6.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 17.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 64.2%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 37.5%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.97%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.98%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 34.1%), male disability (12.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 20.3%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 0.78%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.3%), and disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 3.6%).