Chinese vs Immigrants from Peru Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,768,558 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Peru within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.070. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.011% in Immigrants from Peru. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 11.1 Immigrants from Peru.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $61,988, a difference of 25.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $103,173, a difference of 12.6%), and median family income ($116,188 compared to $103,534, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $56,384, a difference of 3.2%), wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $47,025, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 50.6%), married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 48.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 43.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 0.41%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 4.4%), and single male poverty (11.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 50.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 27.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.86%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 6.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 34.2%, a difference of 13.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 28.9%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.7%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.31, a difference of 0.87%), family households (68.1% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 39.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 38.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 10.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 23.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 70.7%), college, under 1 year (68.3% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 8.2%), and college, 1 year or more (62.2% compared to 57.7%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 36.5%), male disability (12.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 16.9%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 2.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 3.9%).