Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 108,323,443 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.291. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.070% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs corresponds to a decrease of 70.0 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,195 compared to $54,264, a difference of 20.1%), median female earnings ($39,159 compared to $46,972, a difference of 20.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,936 compared to $119,756, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,108 compared to $69,174, a difference of 7.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($110,201 compared to $122,178, a difference of 10.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($65,329 compared to $57,931, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (13.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 47.1%), single father poverty (11.7% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 27.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.11%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 42.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 16.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.9% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 23.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.2% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.030%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (22.0% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 12.3%), married-couple households (51.8% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 7.0%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.47%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and divorced or separated (10.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 117.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 19.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 9.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.5% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 17.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 18.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 86.9%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 48.8%), and master's degree (15.8% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.090%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.090%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 26.7%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 22.3%), and ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 4.5%), disability age over 75 (49.1% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 5.9%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 10.8%).