Chinese vs Kiowa Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chinese
Kiowa
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chinese
Kiowa
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,045
SOCIAL INDEX
18.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
274th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Kiowa Integration in Chinese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 28,331,600 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Kiowa within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.577. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.020% in Kiowa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 19.9 Kiowa.
Chinese vs Kiowa Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $74,815, a difference of 55.3%), householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $51,140, a difference of 51.5%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $65,914, a difference of 49.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 9.7%), median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $34,074, a difference of 21.7%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $39,232, a difference of 24.5%).
Income Metric | Chinese | Kiowa |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,098 | Tragic $35,102 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $116,188 | Tragic $80,885 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $98,496 | Tragic $65,914 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,836 | Tragic $39,232 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,872 | Tragic $45,094 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,461 | Tragic $34,074 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $58,162 | Tragic $44,733 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,264 | Tragic $74,776 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $116,156 | Tragic $74,815 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $77,465 | Tragic $51,140 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.9% | Exceptional 23.6% |
Chinese vs Kiowa Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (12.3% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 91.9%), family poverty (6.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 88.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.1% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 87.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 36.0%), single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 44.1%), and single father poverty (15.4% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 45.9%).
Poverty Metric | Chinese | Kiowa |
Poverty | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 16.8% |
Families | Exceptional 6.5% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 15.2% |
Females | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 18.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 16.2% | Tragic 29.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 19.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.1% | Tragic 24.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 22.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 21.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.3% | Tragic 23.7% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 18.3% |
Single Females | Exceptional 16.1% | Tragic 26.9% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 22.5% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 24.6% | Tragic 35.5% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.6% | Tragic 6.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 8.3% | Tragic 12.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 9.1% | Fair 12.3% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.8% | Tragic 14.9% |
Chinese vs Kiowa Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 57.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 55.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 4.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 12.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 15.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Chinese | Kiowa |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.7% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 5.8% |
Females | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.8% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 12.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.0% | Tragic 25.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Poor 10.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.7% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 5.9% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Tragic 8.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 9.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.3% |
Chinese vs Kiowa Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 7.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 3.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chinese | Kiowa |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.7% | Tragic 62.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.7% | Tragic 75.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.6% | Excellent 37.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.3% | Tragic 73.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.3% | Tragic 81.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Tragic 79.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.1% | Tragic 79.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.1% | Tragic 78.3% |
Chinese vs Kiowa Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 43.1%, a difference of 42.6%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 41.4%), and single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.27, a difference of 2.1%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 4.8%), and family households (68.1% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 11.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Chinese | Kiowa |
Family Households | Exceptional 68.1% | Tragic 61.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.0% | Fair 27.3% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 50.4% | Tragic 42.0% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.34 | Exceptional 3.27 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 7.1% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.5% | Tragic 43.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 14.5% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.2% | Tragic 43.1% |
Chinese vs Kiowa Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 42.1%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 40.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 3.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 11.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 22.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chinese | Kiowa |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 11.5% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.9% | Tragic 88.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.1% | Tragic 53.9% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.9% | Average 19.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.8% | Fair 6.2% |
Chinese vs Kiowa Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 44.7%), master's degree (14.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 34.5%), and bachelor's degree (38.5% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.11%), 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.11%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.12%).
Education Level Metric | Chinese | Kiowa |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.7% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Good 93.9% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.6% | Fair 92.2% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Tragic 90.0% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Tragic 88.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.0% | Tragic 83.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.3% | Tragic 57.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.2% | Tragic 51.0% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.5% | Tragic 36.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.5% | Tragic 28.8% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.6% | Tragic 10.8% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.5% | Tragic 3.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Tragic 1.5% |
Chinese vs Kiowa Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 68.6%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 59.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 50.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 11.3%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 15.9%), and cognitive disability (15.9% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 17.5%).
Disability Metric | Chinese | Kiowa |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 15.6% |
Males | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 15.4% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Tragic 15.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Tragic 8.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 17.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.7% | Tragic 32.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.7% | Tragic 54.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 3.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 4.3% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 15.9% | Tragic 18.7% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 8.6% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 3.0% |