Chinese vs Scotch-Irish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,526,197 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Scotch-Irish within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.555. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.416% in Scotch-Irish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 415.5 Scotch-Irish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $59,447, a difference of 30.3%), median household income ($98,496 compared to $80,972, a difference of 21.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $97,073, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $53,658, a difference of 6.0%), per capita income ($46,098 compared to $42,563, a difference of 8.3%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $44,924, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (16.1% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 42.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 39.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 38.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 7.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 14.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 19.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 68.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 23.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.26%), unemployment (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 7.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 0.30%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 17.2%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 16.8%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (49.5% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 1.5%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 3.1%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 20.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 19.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 1.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in associate's degree (48.5% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 7.2%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 6.3%), and college, 1 year or more (62.2% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (96.3% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.0%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.060%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 49.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 34.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.42%), disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 4.1%).