Immigrants from Portugal vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Portugal
Immigrants from China
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Portugal
Immigrants from China
2,067
SOCIAL INDEX
18.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
271st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from China Integration in Immigrants from Portugal Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,248,408 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Immigrant from Portugal communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.484. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Portugal within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.079% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Portugal corresponds to a decrease of 78.9 Immigrants from China.
Immigrants from Portugal vs Immigrants from China Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($42,412 compared to $54,264, a difference of 28.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,512 compared to $119,756, a difference of 25.4%), and median family income ($100,984 compared to $125,540, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 0.13%), householder income under 25 years ($54,105 compared to $57,931, a difference of 7.1%), and median female earnings ($39,788 compared to $46,972, a difference of 18.1%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Portugal | Immigrants from China |
Per Capita Income | Poor $42,412 | Exceptional $54,264 |
Median Family Income | Fair $100,984 | Exceptional $125,540 |
Median Household Income | Average $84,740 | Exceptional $105,335 |
Median Earnings | Good $47,304 | Exceptional $56,638 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,182 | Exceptional $67,353 |
Median Female Earnings | Average $39,788 | Exceptional $46,972 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,105 | Exceptional $57,931 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Good $95,512 | Exceptional $119,756 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Fair $99,203 | Exceptional $122,178 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $55,924 | Exceptional $69,174 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 26.7% | Poor 26.7% |
Immigrants from Portugal vs Immigrants from China Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.3% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 49.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.8% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 30.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.050%), male poverty (11.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 4.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 5.4%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Portugal | Immigrants from China |
Poverty | Average 12.3% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Fair 9.4% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Males | Average 11.1% | Excellent 10.7% |
Females | Average 13.6% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 16.5% | Average 20.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Fair 17.8% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Fair 16.6% | Exceptional 13.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Poor 17.4% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Average 16.6% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.3% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 21.9% | Exceptional 18.1% |
Single Fathers | Excellent 15.9% | Exceptional 14.9% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.5% | Exceptional 26.1% |
Married Couples | Excellent 5.0% | Excellent 5.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 11.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.9% | Tragic 13.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.3% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants from Portugal vs Immigrants from China Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 35.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 33.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.32%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Portugal | Immigrants from China |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.7% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Tragic 5.9% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 5.8% | Good 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.0% | Average 11.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Fair 17.8% | Good 17.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Fair 10.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.2% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.2% | Average 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.0% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.0% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.5% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.3% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.7% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants from Portugal vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 27.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.37%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.55%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Portugal | Immigrants from China |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Fair 65.0% | Excellent 65.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Poor 79.3% | Good 79.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.7% | Tragic 31.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 75.8% | Tragic 71.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Fair 84.6% | Average 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.0% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Average 84.4% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.0% | Exceptional 83.2% |
Immigrants from Portugal vs Immigrants from China Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.2% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 46.5%), single father households (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 42.9%), and single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.80%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.93%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Portugal | Immigrants from China |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.2% | Excellent 64.7% |
Family Households with Children | Excellent 27.7% | Average 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 45.2% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.18 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.2% | Exceptional 47.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 11.9% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.2% | Exceptional 24.7% |
Immigrants from Portugal vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 29.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 4.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 2.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Portugal | Immigrants from China |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.7% | Tragic 15.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.3% | Tragic 84.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.8% | Tragic 51.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.6% | Tragic 18.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.1% | Poor 6.0% |
Immigrants from Portugal vs Immigrants from China Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 104.2%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 89.7%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 67.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.3% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.11%), nursery school (97.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and kindergarten (97.3% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.12%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Portugal | Immigrants from China |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.6% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.4% | Tragic 97.5% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.3% | Tragic 97.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Tragic 97.4% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Tragic 97.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Tragic 97.2% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Tragic 97.0% |
5th Grade | Tragic 95.9% | Tragic 96.8% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.5% | Tragic 96.4% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.2% | Tragic 95.3% |
8th Grade | Tragic 93.8% | Tragic 95.0% |
9th Grade | Tragic 92.2% | Tragic 94.3% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.8% | Tragic 93.2% |
11th Grade | Tragic 89.3% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 87.6% | Good 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 85.3% | Good 89.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 81.6% | Exceptional 86.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 57.7% | Exceptional 70.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 51.9% | Exceptional 66.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.1% | Exceptional 55.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 32.2% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.6% | Exceptional 21.2% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 3.1% |
Immigrants from Portugal vs Immigrants from China Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 86.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 43.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.8%), disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 18.4%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Portugal | Immigrants from China |
Disability | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Males | Tragic 12.3% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Females | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.8% | Exceptional 0.96% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.4% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.5% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Poor 24.0% | Exceptional 20.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Fair 47.6% | Exceptional 46.3% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Cognitive | Good 17.2% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.3% |