Chinese vs Brazilian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chinese
Brazilian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chinese
Brazilians
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,919
SOCIAL INDEX
66.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
136th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Brazilian Integration in Chinese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,490,007 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Brazilians within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.369. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.042% in Brazilians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 42.1 Brazilians.
Chinese vs Brazilian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $61,465, a difference of 26.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $104,408, a difference of 11.3%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $88,934, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $56,837, a difference of 0.060%), median earnings ($48,836 compared to $48,356, a difference of 0.99%), and per capita income ($46,098 compared to $46,700, a difference of 1.3%).
Income Metric | Chinese | Brazilian |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,098 | Exceptional $46,700 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $116,188 | Excellent $106,942 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $98,496 | Exceptional $88,934 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,836 | Exceptional $48,356 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,872 | Exceptional $56,837 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,461 | Excellent $40,483 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $58,162 | Exceptional $54,335 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,264 | Excellent $98,267 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $116,156 | Excellent $104,408 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $77,465 | Good $61,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.9% | Tragic 26.7% |
Chinese vs Brazilian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 41.5%), married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 37.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 0.38%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 7.0%), and receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 13.4%).
Poverty Metric | Chinese | Brazilian |
Poverty | Exceptional 9.5% | Good 11.9% |
Families | Exceptional 6.5% | Excellent 8.6% |
Males | Exceptional 8.7% | Excellent 10.8% |
Females | Exceptional 10.4% | Excellent 13.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 16.2% | Exceptional 18.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.0% | Excellent 13.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.1% | Excellent 16.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Excellent 15.4% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Excellent 15.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.3% | Excellent 15.4% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.0% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Single Females | Exceptional 16.1% | Exceptional 20.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Exceptional 15.5% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 24.6% | Exceptional 28.3% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.6% | Good 5.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 8.3% | Poor 11.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 9.1% | Tragic 12.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.8% | Excellent 11.1% |
Chinese vs Brazilian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 56.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 29.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.9%), male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 6.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Chinese | Brazilian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Average 5.3% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.5% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.7% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.0% | Exceptional 17.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Good 10.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Excellent 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Average 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Fair 4.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Fair 4.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Poor 5.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Average 7.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Fair 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 5.8% |
Chinese vs Brazilian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.44%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chinese | Brazilian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.7% | Exceptional 66.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.7% | Exceptional 80.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.6% | Excellent 37.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.3% | Exceptional 75.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.3% | Exceptional 85.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.1% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.1% | Exceptional 83.7% |
Chinese vs Brazilian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 21.0%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 13.0%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 0.47%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.18, a difference of 4.9%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 6.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Chinese | Brazilian |
Family Households | Exceptional 68.1% | Poor 63.9% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.0% | Good 27.7% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 50.4% | Fair 46.2% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.34 | Tragic 3.18 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.2% | Average 6.2% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.5% | Fair 46.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Average 12.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.2% | Excellent 30.4% |
Chinese vs Brazilian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 64.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 37.0%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 53.8%, a difference of 11.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 26.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chinese | Brazilian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Average 10.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.9% | Good 90.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.1% | Tragic 53.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.9% | Tragic 17.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.8% | Tragic 5.4% |
Chinese vs Brazilian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 40.0%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 17.7%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (48.5% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.31%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.57%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.58%).
Education Level Metric | Chinese | Brazilian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Good 2.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Average 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Average 97.9% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Average 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Average 97.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Average 97.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Average 97.5% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Fair 97.2% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Fair 96.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Fair 96.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Fair 95.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Average 94.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Good 93.8% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.6% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Good 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Good 89.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.0% | Good 86.3% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.3% | Good 65.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.2% | Good 60.5% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.5% | Exceptional 48.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.5% | Exceptional 40.8% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.6% | Exceptional 16.5% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.5% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Chinese vs Brazilian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 27.7%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 26.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.62%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 3.0%).
Disability Metric | Chinese | Brazilian |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Males | Tragic 12.1% | Excellent 10.9% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Excellent 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.7% | Exceptional 22.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.7% | Exceptional 46.5% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Good 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Good 2.9% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 15.9% | Good 17.1% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.3% |