Chinese vs German Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,805,124 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Germans within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.044. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.189% in Germans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 189.4 Germans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and German communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $59,730, a difference of 29.7%), median household income ($98,496 compared to $83,358, a difference of 18.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $100,224, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $54,974, a difference of 3.5%), median earnings ($48,836 compared to $45,935, a difference of 6.3%), and per capita income ($46,098 compared to $43,067, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and German communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (16.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 35.0%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 26.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 0.25%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 7.4%), and married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and German communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 73.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 17.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.36%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and German communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 14.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 78.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.41%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and German communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.6%), divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 11.5%), and single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (49.5% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 0.17%), married-couple households (50.4% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and German communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 23.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 18.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 61.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and German communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 9.3%), no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 8.6%), and associate's degree (48.5% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (94.6% compared to 94.7%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.16%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and German communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 50.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 30.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.48%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and cognitive disability (15.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 4.6%).