Chinese vs Immigrants from Korea Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,124,999 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Korea within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.123. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.074% in Immigrants from Korea. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 74.5 Immigrants from Korea.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Korea communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $65,079, a difference of 14.4%), per capita income ($46,098 compared to $51,671, a difference of 12.1%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $54,530, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $121,243, a difference of 4.4%), householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $55,716, a difference of 4.4%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $102,962, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Korea communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 32.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 23.5%), and married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 0.47%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Korea communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 37.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 21.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.31%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Korea communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 14.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.51%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Korea communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 15.1%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 9.7%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (50.4% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 0.98%), currently married (49.5% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Korea communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 30.9%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 16.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 4.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 16.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Korea communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 48.9%), no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 38.7%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 36.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.58%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.59%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Korea communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 34.4%), ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 23.7%), and male disability (12.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.20%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and cognitive disability (15.9% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 3.7%).