Immigrants from Sudan vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,297,044 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Immigrant from Sudan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.456. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Sudan within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.368% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Sudan corresponds to a decrease of 368.4 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sudan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($86,109 compared to $119,756, a difference of 39.1%), median household income ($79,103 compared to $105,335, a difference of 33.2%), and median male earnings ($51,489 compared to $67,353, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 12.9%), householder income over 65 years ($59,248 compared to $69,174, a difference of 16.8%), and median female earnings ($38,511 compared to $46,972, a difference of 22.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sudan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (19.2% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 41.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (18.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 39.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (18.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 5.0%), single father poverty (16.2% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 8.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sudan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 28.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 18.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sudan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.0% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 31.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.8% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 8.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.7% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.42%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sudan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 36.1%), births to unmarried women (33.2% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 34.5%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.41%), family households with children (27.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.70%), and family households (60.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sudan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 45.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 9.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 2.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sudan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 43.1%), professional degree (4.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 37.6%), and master's degree (16.0% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 32.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.020%), 3rd grade (97.5% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.26%), and nursery school (97.7% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sudan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 34.9%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 33.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.2%), disability age over 75 (47.5% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.5%).