Chinese vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,447,795 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.355. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.230% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 230.0 Ecuadorians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $54,958, a difference of 40.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $93,739, a difference of 23.9%), and median family income ($116,188 compared to $95,114, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $39,117, a difference of 6.0%), householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $53,911, a difference of 7.9%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $45,214, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 78.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 73.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 68.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 7.1%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 13.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 18.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 45.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 43.9%), and female unemployment (4.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 39.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 8.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 16.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 21.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 23.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.70%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 39.4%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.0%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.32, a difference of 0.71%), family households (68.1% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 4.9%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 176.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 98.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 69.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 17.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 43.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 69.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 100.6%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 21.0%), and college, under 1 year (68.3% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 46.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.2%), and male disability (12.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.57%), disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 3.7%).