Chinese vs French Canadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,052,753 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of French Canadians within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.338. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.083% in French Canadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 83.3 French Canadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $57,975, a difference of 33.6%), median household income ($98,496 compared to $82,810, a difference of 18.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $99,093, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $54,722, a difference of 3.9%), median earnings ($48,836 compared to $46,026, a difference of 6.1%), and per capita income ($46,098 compared to $43,003, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (16.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 37.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.1% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 35.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 16.5%), receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 16.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 18.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 89.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 27.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.4%), male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 12.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.87%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.0%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 17.1%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 0.48%), currently married (49.5% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 33.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 16.0%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.49%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.5% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 11.2%), associate's degree (48.5% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 8.2%), and bachelor's degree (38.5% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.020%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.020%), and 2nd grade (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 64.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 43.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.32%), ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 3.1%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 3.6%).