Honduran vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 290,300,481 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Honduran communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.556. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hondurans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.044% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hondurans corresponds to a decrease of 44.1 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Honduran and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,540 compared to $119,756, a difference of 52.5%), median family income ($85,004 compared to $125,540, a difference of 47.7%), and per capita income ($37,031 compared to $54,264, a difference of 46.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 13.2%), householder income under 25 years ($48,885 compared to $57,931, a difference of 18.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,634 compared to $69,174, a difference of 31.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Honduran and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.0% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 68.8%), child poverty under the age of 16 (22.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 67.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (22.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 65.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.5% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 6.7%), single father poverty (17.0% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 14.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.4% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 16.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Honduran and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 34.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 30.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.45%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.98%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Honduran and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 13.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.4% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.58%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.8% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Honduran and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 59.9%), births to unmarried women (38.7% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 56.7%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 49.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.52%), average family size (3.35 compared to 3.23, a difference of 3.8%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Honduran and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.0% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 26.6%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 0.94%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Honduran and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 122.4%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 92.7%), and master's degree (11.9% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 77.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.0% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.53%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.54%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Honduran and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 35.8%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 34.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.9% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 5.6%), cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 6.4%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 7.1%).