Chinese vs Dominican Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chinese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Dominican
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chinese

Dominicans

Exceptional
Tragic
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
590
SOCIAL INDEX
3.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
342nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Dominican Integration in Chinese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,190,757 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Dominicans within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.282. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.191% in Dominicans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 191.4 Dominicans.
Chinese Integration in Dominican Communities

Chinese vs Dominican Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Dominican communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $46,964, a difference of 64.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $80,623, a difference of 44.1%), and median family income ($116,188 compared to $82,888, a difference of 40.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $37,046, a difference of 11.9%), median earnings ($48,836 compared to $41,864, a difference of 16.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $49,633, a difference of 17.2%).
Chinese vs Dominican Income
Income MetricChineseDominican
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,098
Tragic
$37,697
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$116,188
Tragic
$82,888
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$98,496
Tragic
$71,302
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,836
Tragic
$41,864
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$56,872
Tragic
$47,204
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,461
Tragic
$37,046
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$58,162
Tragic
$49,633
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$104,264
Tragic
$81,229
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$116,156
Tragic
$80,623
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$77,465
Tragic
$46,964
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.9%
Exceptional
20.6%

Chinese vs Dominican Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Dominican communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 127.7%), family poverty (6.5% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 120.5%), and receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 118.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 23.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 37.7%), and single male poverty (11.0% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 38.6%).
Chinese vs Dominican Poverty
Poverty MetricChineseDominican
Poverty
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
17.6%
Families
Exceptional
6.5%
Tragic
14.3%
Males
Exceptional
8.7%
Tragic
16.1%
Females
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
19.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
16.2%
Tragic
22.3%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
17.6%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.1%
Tragic
24.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
23.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
24.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.3%
Tragic
23.7%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
15.2%
Single Females
Exceptional
16.1%
Tragic
25.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
19.1%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
24.6%
Tragic
34.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.6%
Tragic
8.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
17.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
19.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
21.4%

Chinese vs Dominican Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Dominican communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 60.0%), unemployment (4.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 58.1%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 56.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 16.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 34.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 40.8%).
Chinese vs Dominican Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChineseDominican
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
7.4%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
7.6%
Females
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
7.2%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
15.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.0%
Tragic
23.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
8.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
5.9%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.8%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
10.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
7.5%

Chinese vs Dominican Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Dominican communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 23.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 8.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.87%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.5%).
Chinese vs Dominican Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChineseDominican
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.7%
Tragic
64.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.7%
Tragic
77.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.6%
Tragic
31.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.3%
Tragic
71.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.3%
Tragic
83.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
83.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.1%
Tragic
80.3%

Chinese vs Dominican Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Dominican communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 77.8%), married-couple households (50.4% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 31.9%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.34, a difference of 0.070%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 5.8%), and family households (68.1% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 7.5%).
Chinese vs Dominican Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChineseDominican
Family Households
Exceptional
68.1%
Tragic
63.4%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.0%
Good
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
50.4%
Tragic
38.2%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.34
Exceptional
3.34
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
9.2%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.5%
Tragic
39.5%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
12.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.2%
Tragic
39.8%

Chinese vs Dominican Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Dominican communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 257.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 152.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 112.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 70.7%, a difference of 30.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 70.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 112.7%).
Chinese vs Dominican Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChineseDominican
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
29.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.9%
Tragic
70.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
60.1%
Tragic
35.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.9%
Tragic
11.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Tragic
3.5%

Chinese vs Dominican Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Dominican communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 117.8%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 30.4%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.8%).
Chinese vs Dominican Education Level
Education Level MetricChineseDominican
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Tragic
3.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
96.8%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.7%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.6%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
95.5%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
94.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Tragic
93.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.9%
Tragic
92.8%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Tragic
91.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Tragic
89.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.6%
Tragic
87.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.6%
Tragic
85.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.0%
Tragic
82.9%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
89.0%
Tragic
79.1%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.3%
Tragic
55.5%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.2%
Tragic
50.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.5%
Tragic
39.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Good
38.5%
Tragic
31.8%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.6%
Tragic
12.5%
Professional Degree
Average
4.5%
Tragic
3.5%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Tragic
1.4%

Chinese vs Dominican Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Dominican communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 44.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 39.0%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.70%), male disability (12.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 2.5%).
Chinese vs Dominican Disability
Disability MetricChineseDominican
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
12.7%
Males
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
11.8%
Females
Fair
12.3%
Tragic
13.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.7%
Tragic
26.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.7%
Tragic
50.2%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.6%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Exceptional
15.9%
Tragic
18.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
7.2%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
3.1%