Norwegian vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 442,173,368 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Norwegian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.632. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Norwegians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.015% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Norwegians corresponds to a decrease of 15.3 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,866 compared to $119,756, a difference of 23.6%), median household income ($86,084 compared to $105,335, a difference of 22.4%), and per capita income ($44,480 compared to $54,264, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 8.5%), householder income under 25 years ($53,127 compared to $57,931, a difference of 9.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,104 compared to $69,174, a difference of 13.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 33.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 32.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (13.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 0.55%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 26.0%), female unemployment (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 24.0%), and unemployment (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (46.2% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 48.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (80.1% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 12.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.44%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.7% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.44%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 30.3%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 20.8%), and births to unmarried women (29.3% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.33%), family households (63.9% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and married-couple households (49.5% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 135.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 32.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 10.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.8% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 22.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 31.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 90.1%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 67.9%), and professional degree (4.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 60.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (98.7% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 74.1%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 40.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 40.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.7%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 2.5%).