Chinese vs Maltese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,579,222 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Maltese within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.652. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.077% in Maltese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 76.9 Maltese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $66,027, a difference of 17.3%), wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 11.0%), and median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $62,953, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($116,188 compared to $115,862, a difference of 0.28%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $114,754, a difference of 1.2%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $97,015, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 13.5%), single female poverty (16.1% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 13.2%), and married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 0.52%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 49.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 24.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 8.7%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.16, a difference of 5.8%), and family households (68.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.47%), currently married (49.5% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 33.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 16.4%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.95%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 18.5%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 16.5%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (96.3% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.020%), 7th grade (97.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.030%), and 8th grade (96.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 18.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.6%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 0.43%), female disability (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.7%).