Chinese vs Spanish Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chinese
Spanish
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chinese
Spanish
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,224
SOCIAL INDEX
39.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
203rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Spanish Integration in Chinese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,520,958 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.648. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.521% in Spanish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 521.1 Spanish.
Chinese vs Spanish Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Spanish communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $60,795, a difference of 27.4%), median household income ($98,496 compared to $83,343, a difference of 18.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $98,554, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 4.8%), median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $53,576, a difference of 6.1%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $45,432, a difference of 7.5%).
Income Metric | Chinese | Spanish |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,098 | Poor $42,249 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $116,188 | Fair $99,977 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $98,496 | Fair $83,343 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,836 | Poor $45,432 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,872 | Fair $53,576 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,461 | Tragic $38,098 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $58,162 | Tragic $50,813 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,264 | Fair $92,200 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $116,156 | Fair $98,554 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $77,465 | Average $60,795 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.9% | Tragic 27.1% |
Chinese vs Spanish Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Spanish communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 44.6%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 43.7%), and family poverty (6.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 42.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 8.3%), single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 22.3%), and receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 22.4%).
Poverty Metric | Chinese | Spanish |
Poverty | Exceptional 9.5% | Poor 12.8% |
Families | Exceptional 6.5% | Fair 9.3% |
Males | Exceptional 8.7% | Poor 11.7% |
Females | Exceptional 10.4% | Fair 13.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 16.2% | Poor 20.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 14.6% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.1% | Tragic 18.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Fair 16.7% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Fair 17.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.3% | Fair 16.9% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 13.6% |
Single Females | Exceptional 16.1% | Tragic 22.0% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Poor 16.7% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 24.6% | Tragic 30.1% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.6% | Average 5.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 8.3% | Good 10.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 9.1% | Excellent 11.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.8% | Fair 12.0% |
Chinese vs Spanish Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Spanish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 54.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 21.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 3.9%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 7.8%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 7.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Chinese | Spanish |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Poor 5.4% |
Females | Exceptional 4.5% | Average 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.7% | Good 11.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.0% | Good 17.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Excellent 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Poor 6.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Fair 4.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Good 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Poor 7.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Good 8.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Average 5.4% |
Chinese vs Spanish Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Spanish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.88%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 1.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chinese | Spanish |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.7% | Tragic 63.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.7% | Tragic 78.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.6% | Exceptional 39.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.3% | Exceptional 76.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.3% | Tragic 83.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.1% | Tragic 83.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.1% | Tragic 81.3% |
Chinese vs Spanish Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Spanish communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 28.3%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 24.6%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.23, a difference of 3.6%), family households (68.1% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 4.8%), and currently married (49.5% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 5.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Chinese | Spanish |
Family Households | Exceptional 68.1% | Exceptional 65.0% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.0% | Excellent 27.7% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 50.4% | Excellent 47.2% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.34 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.2% | Fair 6.4% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.5% | Good 47.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 12.8% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.2% | Tragic 34.1% |
Chinese vs Spanish Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Spanish communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 11.8%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 3.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 0.14%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.44%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 3.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chinese | Spanish |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.9% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.1% | Exceptional 60.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.9% | Exceptional 23.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.8% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Chinese vs Spanish Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Spanish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 27.4%), associate's degree (48.5% compared to 44.4%, a difference of 9.3%), and bachelor's degree (38.5% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.36%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.36%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.36%).
Education Level Metric | Chinese | Spanish |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 97.6% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.3% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Excellent 96.3% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Excellent 96.0% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Excellent 95.2% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Good 94.0% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.6% | Good 92.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Average 91.1% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Average 89.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.0% | Fair 85.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.3% | Fair 64.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.2% | Fair 58.5% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.5% | Tragic 44.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.5% | Tragic 35.8% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.6% | Poor 14.2% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.5% | Fair 4.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Average 1.8% |
Chinese vs Spanish Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Spanish communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 27.0%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 24.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 0.78%), disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.4%).
Disability Metric | Chinese | Spanish |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 12.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 12.7% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Tragic 13.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 12.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.7% | Tragic 24.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.7% | Tragic 48.0% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 15.9% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 6.6% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.6% |