Chinese vs British Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chinese
British
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chinese
British
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,012
SOCIAL INDEX
77.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
92nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
British Integration in Chinese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,344,740 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of British within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.289. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.141% in British. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 140.7 British.
Chinese vs British Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and British communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $63,940, a difference of 21.1%), householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $51,477, a difference of 13.0%), and wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($46,098 compared to $46,571, a difference of 1.0%), median earnings ($48,836 compared to $48,189, a difference of 1.3%), and median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $57,890, a difference of 1.8%).
Income Metric | Chinese | British |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,098 | Exceptional $46,571 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $116,188 | Exceptional $108,705 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $98,496 | Exceptional $88,914 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,836 | Exceptional $48,189 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,872 | Exceptional $57,890 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,461 | Average $39,772 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $58,162 | Poor $51,477 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,264 | Excellent $98,359 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $116,156 | Exceptional $106,264 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $77,465 | Exceptional $63,940 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.9% | Tragic 28.9% |
Chinese vs British Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and British communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (16.1% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 30.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 27.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 0.34%), single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 9.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 13.0%).
Poverty Metric | Chinese | British |
Poverty | Exceptional 9.5% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Families | Exceptional 6.5% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Males | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females | Exceptional 10.4% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 16.2% | Tragic 20.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.0% | Good 13.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.1% | Excellent 16.3% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 15.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.3% | Exceptional 15.0% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 13.3% |
Single Females | Exceptional 16.1% | Average 21.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 16.8% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 24.6% | Average 29.2% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.6% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 8.3% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 9.1% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.8% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Chinese vs British Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and British communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 62.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 18.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 2.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Chinese | British |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.0% | Exceptional 16.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Excellent 5.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 9.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Good 7.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Average 8.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Chinese vs British Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and British communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.43%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.59%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chinese | British |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.7% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.7% | Poor 79.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.6% | Exceptional 40.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.3% | Exceptional 76.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.3% | Good 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Fair 84.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.1% | Fair 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.1% | Fair 82.6% |
Chinese vs British Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and British communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 13.0%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.0%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (49.5% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 1.5%), births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 3.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Chinese | British |
Family Households | Exceptional 68.1% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.0% | Average 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 50.4% | Exceptional 48.7% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.34 | Tragic 3.13 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.5% | Exceptional 48.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Poor 12.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.2% | Good 30.8% |
Chinese vs British Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and British communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 22.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 8.9%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 60.0%, a difference of 0.10%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 0.73%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 8.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chinese | British |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Exceptional 7.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.9% | Exceptional 92.5% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.1% | Exceptional 60.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.9% | Exceptional 21.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.8% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Chinese vs British Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and British communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 22.8%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 12.8%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.010%), 6th grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.010%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.020%).
Education Level Metric | Chinese | British |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 97.2% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Exceptional 97.0% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 95.3% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.6% | Exceptional 94.2% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Exceptional 92.9% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Exceptional 91.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.0% | Exceptional 87.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.3% | Exceptional 68.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.2% | Exceptional 62.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.5% | Exceptional 48.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.5% | Exceptional 40.4% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.6% | Exceptional 16.4% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.5% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Chinese vs British Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and British communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 30.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 25.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.010%), disability (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.29%), and female disability (12.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.62%).
Disability Metric | Chinese | British |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Poor 12.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Tragic 7.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Poor 11.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.7% | Good 23.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.7% | Exceptional 46.5% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Fair 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.5% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 15.9% | Excellent 17.0% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Fair 6.2% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.4% |