Burmese vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 415,879,138 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.107. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.033% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to an increase of 32.6 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $57,931, a difference of 5.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($113,701 compared to $119,756, a difference of 5.3%), and wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($121,444 compared to $122,178, a difference of 0.60%), median family income ($123,369 compared to $125,540, a difference of 1.8%), and median household income ($103,145 compared to $105,335, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 14.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 13.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.22%), single mother poverty (26.2% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 0.54%), and single female poverty (18.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 9.6%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 7.0%), and male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.45%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.57%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 10.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 10.1%), births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 6.8%), and divorced or separated (10.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.36%), family households (65.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and currently married (48.9% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 56.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 13.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 6.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 12.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 13.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 31.5%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 17.1%), and professional degree (6.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (66.7% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 0.50%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.63%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 16.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.0%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.48%), female disability (10.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.51%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 0.87%).