Immigrants from Armenia vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,710,797 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Immigrant from Armenia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.158. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Armenia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.032% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Armenia corresponds to a decrease of 32.3 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($51,793 compared to $67,353, a difference of 30.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,863 compared to $122,178, a difference of 28.8%), and wage/income gap (20.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,986 compared to $57,931, a difference of 9.3%), median female earnings ($40,340 compared to $46,972, a difference of 16.4%), and per capita income ($44,552 compared to $54,264, a difference of 21.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 43.1%), receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 36.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (18.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.2% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 1.5%), single female poverty (18.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.9% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 41.2%), female unemployment (7.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 36.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (8.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 6.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 15.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 17.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (29.0% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.31%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 14.5%), married-couple households (44.3% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 9.4%), and currently married (44.3% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.9%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and average family size (3.35 compared to 3.23, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.6% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 43.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 7.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.3% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 3.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 79.2%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 48.4%), and master's degree (14.5% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 46.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.7% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.84%), kindergarten (96.6% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.84%), and 1st grade (96.6% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (4.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 79.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (28.0% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 38.0%), and ambulatory disability (7.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 31.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 4.7%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 5.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.9%).