Chinese vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,798,619 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.344. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.047% in Immigrants from Middle Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 47.0 Immigrants from Middle Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $58,375, a difference of 32.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $91,293, a difference of 27.2%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $77,559, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $37,965, a difference of 9.2%), median earnings ($48,836 compared to $43,416, a difference of 12.5%), and median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $49,201, a difference of 15.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 59.7%), child poverty under the age of 16 (11.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 59.6%), and family poverty (6.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 55.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 1.5%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 15.6%), and single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 23.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 40.4%), female unemployment (4.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 19.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 49.6%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 26.2%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.25, a difference of 2.8%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 7.6%), and family households (68.1% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 52.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 30.9%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 12.5%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 23.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 63.2%), associate's degree (48.5% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 8.6%), and college, 1 year or more (62.2% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (14.6% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 0.17%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.95%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 33.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 26.5%), and cognitive disability (15.9% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.1%), disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and disability (12.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.3%).