Chinese vs Immigrants from Jamaica Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,446,451 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jamaica within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.334. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.063% in Immigrants from Jamaica. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 62.6 Immigrants from Jamaica.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $54,027, a difference of 43.4%), wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 37.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $87,035, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $38,625, a difference of 7.3%), median earnings ($48,836 compared to $43,026, a difference of 13.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $51,038, a difference of 14.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 72.8%), family poverty (6.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 71.4%), and married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 70.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 11.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 17.2%), and single male poverty (11.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 18.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 49.9%), female unemployment (4.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 38.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 3.1%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 18.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 26.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 32.2%, a difference of 19.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.62%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 61.9%), births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 28.3%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.33, a difference of 0.19%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and family households (68.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 100.5%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 73.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 62.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 7.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 35.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 62.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 66.6%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 29.2%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 40.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 30.1%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and female disability (12.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 2.4%).