Sudanese vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

COMPARE

Sudanese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from China
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Sudanese

Immigrants from China

Average
Good
4,867
SOCIAL INDEX
46.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
190th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from China Integration in Sudanese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,609,059 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Sudanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.469. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sudanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.182% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sudanese corresponds to a decrease of 181.7 Immigrants from China.
Sudanese Integration in Immigrants from China Communities

Sudanese vs Immigrants from China Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,401 compared to $119,756, a difference of 41.9%), median household income ($78,529 compared to $105,335, a difference of 34.1%), and median male earnings ($51,216 compared to $67,353, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 11.3%), householder income over 65 years ($58,281 compared to $69,174, a difference of 18.7%), and median female earnings ($38,215 compared to $46,972, a difference of 22.9%).
Sudanese vs Immigrants from China Income
Income MetricSudaneseImmigrants from China
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$41,695
Exceptional
$54,264
Median Family Income
Tragic
$96,783
Exceptional
$125,540
Median Household Income
Tragic
$78,529
Exceptional
$105,335
Median Earnings
Tragic
$44,419
Exceptional
$56,638
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,216
Exceptional
$67,353
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,215
Exceptional
$46,972
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$46,982
Exceptional
$57,931
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$84,401
Exceptional
$119,756
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$93,718
Exceptional
$122,178
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$58,281
Exceptional
$69,174
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.0%
Poor
26.7%

Sudanese vs Immigrants from China Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (19.3% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 42.1%), child poverty under the age of 16 (18.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 39.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (18.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 38.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 6.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 6.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 12.2%).
Sudanese vs Immigrants from China Poverty
Poverty MetricSudaneseImmigrants from China
Poverty
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
23.0%
Average
20.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
13.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
13.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
18.6%
Exceptional
13.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.6%
Exceptional
13.4%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Exceptional
11.4%
Single Females
Tragic
22.6%
Exceptional
18.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.9%
Exceptional
14.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.0%
Exceptional
26.1%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.6%
Excellent
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.7%
Tragic
11.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.8%
Tragic
13.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Fair
12.0%
Exceptional
9.6%

Sudanese vs Immigrants from China Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 25.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 18.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 3.7%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 6.5%).
Sudanese vs Immigrants from China Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSudaneseImmigrants from China
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Good
5.2%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Good
5.2%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.6%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.8%
Good
17.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.4%
Poor
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.8%
Exceptional
6.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.4%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
4.9%

Sudanese vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.9% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 37.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.4% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 10.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (68.0% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.35%).
Sudanese vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSudaneseImmigrants from China
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
68.0%
Excellent
65.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.8%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
42.9%
Tragic
31.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.4%
Tragic
71.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.9%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.2%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.0%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Excellent
83.0%
Exceptional
83.2%

Sudanese vs Immigrants from China Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 36.4%), births to unmarried women (32.4% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 31.3%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.27%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.86%), and family households (60.0% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 7.8%).
Sudanese vs Immigrants from China Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSudaneseImmigrants from China
Family Households
Tragic
60.0%
Excellent
64.7%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.4%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.1%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Poor
2.4%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.7%
Exceptional
47.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.4%
Exceptional
10.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Fair
32.4%
Exceptional
24.7%

Sudanese vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 54.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 7.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.6% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 4.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 6.3%).
Sudanese vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSudaneseImmigrants from China
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.8%
Tragic
15.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.3%
Tragic
84.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.6%
Tragic
51.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.8%
Tragic
18.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.6%
Poor
6.0%

Sudanese vs Immigrants from China Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 47.5%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 45.0%), and master's degree (15.3% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 38.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.5% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.20%), high school diploma (89.1% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.21%), and nursery school (97.7% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.26%).
Sudanese vs Immigrants from China Education Level
Education Level MetricSudaneseImmigrants from China
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.7%
Tragic
97.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.7%
Tragic
97.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Tragic
97.4%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Tragic
97.3%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Tragic
97.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
97.0%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Tragic
96.8%
6th Grade
Poor
96.8%
Tragic
96.4%
7th Grade
Fair
95.9%
Tragic
95.3%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Tragic
95.0%
9th Grade
Fair
94.7%
Tragic
94.3%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Tragic
93.2%
11th Grade
Average
92.5%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
91.0%
Good
91.3%
High School Diploma
Average
89.1%
Good
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.5%
Exceptional
86.9%
College, Under 1 year
Good
66.2%
Exceptional
70.9%
College, 1 year or more
Good
60.2%
Exceptional
66.4%
Associate's Degree
Good
47.1%
Exceptional
55.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Good
38.9%
Exceptional
48.4%
Master's Degree
Good
15.3%
Exceptional
21.2%
Professional Degree
Excellent
4.6%
Exceptional
6.7%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
3.1%

Sudanese vs Immigrants from China Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 37.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 29.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.5% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.6%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.6%).
Sudanese vs Immigrants from China Disability
Disability MetricSudaneseImmigrants from China
Disability
Good
11.5%
Exceptional
10.1%
Males
Good
11.0%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
0.96%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
8.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.7%
Exceptional
20.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Fair
47.5%
Exceptional
46.3%
Vision
Excellent
2.1%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.9%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.3%