Chinese vs Sudanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,371,663 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Sudanese within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.161. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.066% in Sudanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 66.1 Sudanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $58,281, a difference of 32.9%), median household income ($98,496 compared to $78,529, a difference of 25.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $93,718, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 8.1%), median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $38,215, a difference of 8.5%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $44,419, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 56.7%), child poverty under the age of 16 (11.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 55.1%), and married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 54.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 3.0%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 18.9%), and single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 22.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 40.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 24.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and male unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 11.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 68.0%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 33.8%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 22.7%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.20, a difference of 4.4%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 5.2%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 57.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 33.7%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 12.1%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 19.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 57.0%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 18.6%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.85%), 2nd grade (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.85%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 25.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 24.4%), and cognitive disability (15.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.48%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and female disability (12.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.5%).