Chinese vs Immigrants from Japan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,595,888 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.260. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.185% in Immigrants from Japan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 185.4 Immigrants from Japan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,098 compared to $53,359, a difference of 15.8%), median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $65,518, a difference of 15.2%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $54,938, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $118,498, a difference of 2.0%), median household income ($98,496 compared to $100,711, a difference of 2.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $55,932, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 27.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 22.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 0.43%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 36.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 17.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.13%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.40%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 34.7%, a difference of 11.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.44%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.60%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 14.5%), family households (68.1% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 7.5%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.18%), divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.74%), and single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 40.9%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 39.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 9.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 25.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 57.8%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 42.6%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.39%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.39%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 24.8%), ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 16.7%), and male disability (12.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 3.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 4.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.9%).