Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from China
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar

Immigrants from China

Fair
Good
3,365
SOCIAL INDEX
31.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
222nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from China Integration in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,596,293 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Immigrant from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.422. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.334% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar corresponds to a decrease of 334.5 Immigrants from China.
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Integration in Immigrants from China Communities

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from China Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($86,736 compared to $119,756, a difference of 38.1%), per capita income ($39,827 compared to $54,264, a difference of 36.2%), and median male earnings ($50,298 compared to $67,353, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 16.8%), householder income under 25 years ($48,749 compared to $57,931, a difference of 18.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($57,114 compared to $69,174, a difference of 21.1%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from China Income
Income MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarImmigrants from China
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,827
Exceptional
$54,264
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,472
Exceptional
$125,540
Median Household Income
Tragic
$78,682
Exceptional
$105,335
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,998
Exceptional
$56,638
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,298
Exceptional
$67,353
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,028
Exceptional
$46,972
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$48,749
Exceptional
$57,931
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$86,736
Exceptional
$119,756
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$91,385
Exceptional
$122,178
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$57,114
Exceptional
$69,174
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.8%
Poor
26.7%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from China Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (20.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 49.6%), child poverty among girls under 16 (19.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 46.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 45.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 7.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 9.6%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from China Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarImmigrants from China
Poverty
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Tragic
10.5%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Tragic
13.0%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.6%
Average
20.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
13.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Exceptional
13.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.2%
Exceptional
13.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Exceptional
13.4%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Exceptional
11.4%
Single Females
Tragic
22.6%
Exceptional
18.1%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Exceptional
14.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.6%
Exceptional
26.1%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.0%
Excellent
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.3%
Tragic
11.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.1%
Tragic
13.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
9.6%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from China Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 17.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 14.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.53%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.63%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.64%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from China Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarImmigrants from China
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Good
5.2%
Males
Good
5.2%
Good
5.2%
Females
Exceptional
5.1%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.6%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Good
17.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.6%
Poor
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
6.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.5%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Exceptional
4.9%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 25.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 7.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.090%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.80%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarImmigrants from China
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.3%
Excellent
65.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.0%
Tragic
31.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.3%
Tragic
71.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.7%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
84.0%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.0%
Exceptional
83.2%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from China Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 39.3%), births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 33.2%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 31.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.9%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households (62.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 3.4%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from China Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarImmigrants from China
Family Households
Tragic
62.6%
Excellent
64.7%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.4%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.29
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Poor
2.4%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.3%
Exceptional
47.9%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Exceptional
10.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
32.9%
Exceptional
24.7%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 45.5%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 5.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 3.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 4.8%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarImmigrants from China
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Tragic
15.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.7%
Tragic
84.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.9%
Tragic
51.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.8%
Tragic
18.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Poor
6.0%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from China Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 80.2%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 70.4%), and master's degree (13.5% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 56.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.62%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.63%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.63%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from China Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarImmigrants from China
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
2.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.9%
Tragic
97.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.8%
Tragic
97.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Tragic
97.4%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Tragic
97.3%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Tragic
97.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Tragic
97.0%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.1%
Tragic
96.8%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Tragic
96.4%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Tragic
95.3%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.1%
Tragic
95.0%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Tragic
94.3%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Tragic
93.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.4%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.9%
Good
91.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.7%
Good
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.0%
Exceptional
86.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.5%
Exceptional
70.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.6%
Exceptional
66.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.7%
Exceptional
55.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.5%
Exceptional
48.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
21.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.9%
Exceptional
6.7%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Exceptional
3.1%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from China Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 41.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 25.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 3.4%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.7%), and cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 7.8%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from China Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarImmigrants from China
Disability
Fair
11.8%
Exceptional
10.1%
Males
Average
11.2%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
0.96%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Average
5.6%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Poor
6.8%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
8.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
24.0%
Exceptional
20.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Poor
47.9%
Exceptional
46.3%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.2%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Exceptional
2.3%