Arab vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

COMPARE

Arab
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from China
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Arabs

Immigrants from China

Average
Good
6,013
SOCIAL INDEX
57.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
166th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from China Integration in Arab Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 427,529,249 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Arab communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.340. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arabs within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.024% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arabs corresponds to a decrease of 24.0 Immigrants from China.
Arab Integration in Immigrants from China Communities

Arab vs Immigrants from China Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arab and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,336 compared to $119,756, a difference of 23.0%), median household income ($88,398 compared to $105,335, a difference of 19.2%), and per capita income ($45,662 compared to $54,264, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 0.32%), householder income over 65 years ($62,266 compared to $69,174, a difference of 11.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,219 compared to $57,931, a difference of 13.1%).
Arab vs Immigrants from China Income
Income MetricArabImmigrants from China
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,662
Exceptional
$54,264
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,952
Exceptional
$125,540
Median Household Income
Excellent
$88,398
Exceptional
$105,335
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,599
Exceptional
$56,638
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$57,298
Exceptional
$67,353
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,718
Exceptional
$46,972
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,219
Exceptional
$57,931
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,336
Exceptional
$119,756
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$104,566
Exceptional
$122,178
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$62,266
Exceptional
$69,174
Wage/Income Gap
Poor
26.6%
Poor
26.7%

Arab vs Immigrants from China Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arab and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (17.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 27.9%), child poverty among girls under 16 (16.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 25.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (16.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 1.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 6.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 8.5%).
Arab vs Immigrants from China Poverty
Poverty MetricArabImmigrants from China
Poverty
Fair
12.7%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Fair
9.2%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Poor
11.6%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Fair
13.7%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Poor
20.5%
Average
20.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Good
13.2%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Average
17.4%
Exceptional
13.6%
Children Under 16 years
Fair
16.6%
Exceptional
13.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Fair
16.8%
Exceptional
13.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
16.8%
Exceptional
13.4%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Exceptional
11.4%
Single Females
Good
20.7%
Exceptional
18.1%
Single Fathers
Poor
16.6%
Exceptional
14.9%
Single Mothers
Good
29.0%
Exceptional
26.1%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.7%
Excellent
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.8%
Tragic
11.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Average
12.2%
Tragic
13.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Good
11.5%
Exceptional
9.6%

Arab vs Immigrants from China Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arab and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 27.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 22.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.84%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.6%).
Arab vs Immigrants from China Unemployment
Unemployment MetricArabImmigrants from China
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Good
5.2%
Males
Fair
5.4%
Good
5.2%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Poor
11.8%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Good
17.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.6%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Average
4.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Average
4.8%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
5.4%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Poor
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.5%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
6.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Fair
5.6%
Exceptional
4.9%

Arab vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arab and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 18.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.45%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.58%).
Arab vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricArabImmigrants from China
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Good
65.2%
Excellent
65.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.2%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Good
36.8%
Tragic
31.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.6%
Tragic
71.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.2%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.3%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.8%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Poor
82.4%
Exceptional
83.2%

Arab vs Immigrants from China Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arab and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 19.1%), births to unmarried women (29.2% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 18.3%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.070%), family households (64.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and currently married (47.0% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.9%).
Arab vs Immigrants from China Family Structure
Family Structure MetricArabImmigrants from China
Family Households
Fair
64.1%
Excellent
64.7%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.9%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Exceptional
47.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
10.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.2%
Exceptional
24.7%

Arab vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arab and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 44.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 6.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.13%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 5.5%).
Arab vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricArabImmigrants from China
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.5%
Tragic
15.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.6%
Tragic
84.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Fair
55.0%
Tragic
51.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Tragic
18.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.0%
Poor
6.0%

Arab vs Immigrants from China Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arab and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 47.4%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 33.4%), and master's degree (16.7% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.6% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.38%), ged/equivalency (86.6% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 0.38%), and high school diploma (89.7% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.43%).
Arab vs Immigrants from China Education Level
Education Level MetricArabImmigrants from China
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Tragic
2.6%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Tragic
97.5%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Tragic
97.4%
1st Grade
Fair
97.9%
Tragic
97.4%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Tragic
97.3%
3rd Grade
Fair
97.7%
Tragic
97.2%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Tragic
97.0%
5th Grade
Average
97.3%
Tragic
96.8%
6th Grade
Average
97.0%
Tragic
96.4%
7th Grade
Good
96.2%
Tragic
95.3%
8th Grade
Good
95.9%
Tragic
95.0%
9th Grade
Good
95.1%
Tragic
94.3%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.0%
Tragic
93.2%
11th Grade
Excellent
92.9%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Excellent
91.6%
Good
91.3%
High School Diploma
Excellent
89.7%
Good
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.6%
Exceptional
86.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.2%
Exceptional
70.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
61.6%
Exceptional
66.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.0%
Exceptional
55.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.9%
Exceptional
48.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.7%
Exceptional
21.2%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
6.7%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
3.1%

Arab vs Immigrants from China Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arab and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 26.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 25.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.6%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.4%).
Arab vs Immigrants from China Disability
Disability MetricArabImmigrants from China
Disability
Excellent
11.4%
Exceptional
10.1%
Males
Excellent
11.0%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Exceptional
0.96%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Good
6.5%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Excellent
10.9%
Exceptional
8.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
22.8%
Exceptional
20.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.1%
Exceptional
46.3%
Vision
Excellent
2.1%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Average
3.0%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.9%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Good
2.4%
Exceptional
2.3%