Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago
Immigrants from China
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago
Immigrants from China
1,653
SOCIAL INDEX
14.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
294th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from China Integration in Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,468,925 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Immigrant from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.242. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.112% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago corresponds to a decrease of 111.6 Immigrants from China.
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago vs Immigrants from China Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.3% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 38.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,347 compared to $122,178, a difference of 33.8%), and median family income ($93,988 compared to $125,540, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,437 compared to $57,931, a difference of 10.5%), median female earnings ($40,895 compared to $46,972, a difference of 14.9%), and median earnings ($45,729 compared to $56,638, a difference of 23.9%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago | Immigrants from China |
| Per Capita Income | Tragic $41,476 | Exceptional $54,264 |
| Median Family Income | Tragic $93,988 | Exceptional $125,540 |
| Median Household Income | Tragic $80,373 | Exceptional $105,335 |
| Median Earnings | Fair $45,729 | Exceptional $56,638 |
| Median Male Earnings | Tragic $51,376 | Exceptional $67,353 |
| Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,895 | Exceptional $46,972 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Good $52,437 | Exceptional $57,931 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $89,748 | Exceptional $119,756 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $91,347 | Exceptional $122,178 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $55,598 | Exceptional $69,174 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 19.3% | Poor 26.7% |
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago vs Immigrants from China Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 65.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 43.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 2.6%), single father poverty (16.8% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 12.8%), and single mother poverty (29.5% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 12.9%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago | Immigrants from China |
| Poverty | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Families | Tragic 10.9% | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Males | Tragic 13.1% | Excellent 10.7% |
| Females | Tragic 15.4% | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Excellent 19.7% | Average 20.2% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Poor 14.0% | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.4% | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.1% | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.2% | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Single Males | Fair 12.9% | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Single Females | Average 20.9% | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Single Fathers | Tragic 16.8% | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Single Mothers | Fair 29.5% | Exceptional 26.1% |
| Married Couples | Tragic 6.4% | Excellent 5.0% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 11.5% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 15.7% | Tragic 13.2% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 15.8% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago vs Immigrants from China Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (23.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 32.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 28.9%), and male unemployment (6.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.6%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago | Immigrants from China |
| Unemployment | Tragic 6.3% | Good 5.2% |
| Males | Tragic 6.7% | Good 5.2% |
| Females | Tragic 6.1% | Good 5.2% |
| Youth < 25 | Tragic 14.6% | Average 11.6% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 23.1% | Good 17.5% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.8% | Fair 10.4% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.9% | Exceptional 6.2% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.3% | Average 4.5% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.3% | Tragic 5.0% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.3% | Tragic 5.1% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.5% | Fair 5.4% |
| Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.3% | Poor 5.2% |
| Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.5% | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 6.2% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Poor 9.1% | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.2% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.40%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.87%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago | Immigrants from China |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Poor 64.8% | Excellent 65.4% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.8% | Good 79.7% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 31.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 71.1% | Tragic 71.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.7% | Average 84.6% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.3% | Exceptional 85.4% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Average 84.4% | Exceptional 84.7% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.0% | Exceptional 83.2% |
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago vs Immigrants from China Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 50.3%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 47.1%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.84%), average family size (3.33 compared to 3.23, a difference of 3.1%), and family households with children (26.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 4.2%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago | Immigrants from China |
| Family Households | Fair 64.2% | Excellent 64.7% |
| Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.4% | Average 27.4% |
| Married-couple Households | Tragic 41.2% | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.33 | Average 3.23 |
| Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.6% | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Currently Married | Tragic 41.9% | Exceptional 47.9% |
| Divorced or Separated | Poor 12.2% | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Exceptional 24.7% |
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 62.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 46.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 10.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.3% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 27.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 36.5%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago | Immigrants from China |
| No Vehicles Available | Tragic 24.6% | Tragic 15.2% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 76.8% | Tragic 84.9% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 40.3% | Tragic 51.5% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 18.2% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.1% | Poor 6.0% |
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago vs Immigrants from China Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 109.2%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 73.1%), and master's degree (14.1% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 50.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.10%), 1st grade (97.3% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.10%), and 3rd grade (97.1% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago | Immigrants from China |
| No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.6% |
| Nursery School | Tragic 97.4% | Tragic 97.5% |
| Kindergarten | Tragic 97.3% | Tragic 97.4% |
| 1st Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Tragic 97.4% |
| 2nd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Tragic 97.3% |
| 3rd Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Tragic 97.2% |
| 4th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Tragic 97.0% |
| 5th Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Tragic 96.8% |
| 6th Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Tragic 96.4% |
| 7th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Tragic 95.3% |
| 8th Grade | Tragic 94.6% | Tragic 95.0% |
| 9th Grade | Tragic 93.6% | Tragic 94.3% |
| 10th Grade | Tragic 92.3% | Tragic 93.2% |
| 11th Grade | Tragic 90.9% | Fair 92.3% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.3% | Good 91.3% |
| High School Diploma | Tragic 86.8% | Good 89.3% |
| GED/Equivalency | Tragic 82.8% | Exceptional 86.9% |
| College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.7% | Exceptional 70.9% |
| College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.5% | Exceptional 66.4% |
| Associate's Degree | Tragic 43.3% | Exceptional 55.5% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 35.3% | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Master's Degree | Poor 14.1% | Exceptional 21.2% |
| Professional Degree | Tragic 3.9% | Exceptional 6.7% |
| Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 3.1% |
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago vs Immigrants from China Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 28.9%), ambulatory disability (6.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 25.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.8%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 3.8%), and hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 5.4%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago | Immigrants from China |
| Disability | Average 11.7% | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Males | Excellent 10.9% | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Females | Fair 12.3% | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 0.96% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Average 5.6% | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.9% | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Average 11.2% | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 23.7% | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Fair 47.6% | Exceptional 46.3% |
| Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Hearing | Exceptional 2.5% | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Ambulatory | Tragic 6.7% | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Exceptional 2.3% |