Chinese vs Colville Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 21,989,907 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Colville within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.061. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.023% in Colville. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 23.0 Colville.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Colville communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $51,739, a difference of 49.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $82,474, a difference of 40.8%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $70,094, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $37,514, a difference of 10.5%), median earnings ($48,836 compared to $42,151, a difference of 15.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $49,774, a difference of 16.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Colville communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 103.1%), family poverty (6.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 99.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.1% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 96.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 38.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 59.4%), and single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 39.3%, a difference of 59.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Colville communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 86.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 84.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 77.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 22.0%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 23.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 29.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Colville communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 8.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 0.68%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Colville communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 67.1%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 55.5%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 49.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 0.89%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.14, a difference of 6.4%), and family households (68.1% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Colville communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 66.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 26.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 86.8%, a difference of 5.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 7.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Colville communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (38.5% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 32.6%), no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 31.3%), and associate's degree (48.5% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.29%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.30%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Colville communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 187.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 53.8%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 48.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 13.6%), cognitive disability (15.9% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 15.2%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 21.1%).