Chinese vs Ottawa Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chinese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ottawa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chinese

Ottawa

Exceptional
Fair
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,097
SOCIAL INDEX
28.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
233rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ottawa Integration in Chinese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,051,261 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Ottawa within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.230. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.121% in Ottawa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 121.0 Ottawa.
Chinese Integration in Ottawa Communities

Chinese vs Ottawa Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $53,217, a difference of 45.6%), median household income ($98,496 compared to $70,984, a difference of 38.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $83,953, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 4.1%), median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $46,611, a difference of 22.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $47,366, a difference of 22.8%).
Chinese vs Ottawa Income
Income MetricChineseOttawa
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,098
Tragic
$37,101
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$116,188
Tragic
$86,380
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$98,496
Tragic
$70,984
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,836
Tragic
$39,721
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$56,872
Tragic
$46,611
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,461
Tragic
$33,378
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$58,162
Tragic
$47,366
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$104,264
Tragic
$79,012
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$116,156
Tragic
$83,953
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$77,465
Tragic
$53,217
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.9%
Tragic
27.0%

Chinese vs Ottawa Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 64.5%), single female poverty (16.1% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 61.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (11.9% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 61.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 20.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 25.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 25.4%).
Chinese vs Ottawa Poverty
Poverty MetricChineseOttawa
Poverty
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
14.3%
Families
Exceptional
6.5%
Tragic
10.0%
Males
Exceptional
8.7%
Tragic
13.1%
Females
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
15.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
16.2%
Tragic
22.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
17.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.1%
Tragic
20.3%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
19.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
19.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.3%
Tragic
19.4%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
14.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
16.1%
Tragic
26.0%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
18.6%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
24.6%
Tragic
35.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.6%
Average
5.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
8.3%
Excellent
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
11.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
13.1%

Chinese vs Ottawa Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 45.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 33.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 3.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 5.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 7.7%).
Chinese vs Ottawa Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChineseOttawa
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.5%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Exceptional
4.5%
Poor
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
11.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.0%
Exceptional
16.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
7.3%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.3%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
5.9%
Exceptional
7.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.8%
Tragic
9.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
10.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.1%

Chinese vs Ottawa Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 11.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 76.7%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 0.58%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 3.0%).
Chinese vs Ottawa Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChineseOttawa
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.7%
Tragic
62.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.7%
Tragic
76.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.6%
Exceptional
43.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.3%
Exceptional
76.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.3%
Tragic
83.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Tragic
82.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
82.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.1%
Tragic
79.5%

Chinese vs Ottawa Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 35.0%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 26.1%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 0.24%), currently married (49.5% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 6.4%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.11, a difference of 7.4%).
Chinese vs Ottawa Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChineseOttawa
Family Households
Exceptional
68.1%
Tragic
63.0%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.0%
Tragic
26.1%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
50.4%
Poor
45.8%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.34
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.7%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.2%
Fair
6.5%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.5%
Average
46.5%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
13.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.2%
Tragic
36.5%

Chinese vs Ottawa Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 33.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 18.5%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.92%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 3.9%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 11.4%).
Chinese vs Ottawa Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChineseOttawa
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
7.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.9%
Exceptional
92.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
60.1%
Exceptional
57.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.9%
Excellent
20.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Excellent
6.6%

Chinese vs Ottawa Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 30.1%), bachelor's degree (38.5% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 23.6%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.10%), 5th grade (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.11%).
Chinese vs Ottawa Education Level
Education Level MetricChineseOttawa
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
98.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.9%
Exceptional
97.9%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Exceptional
96.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Exceptional
95.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.6%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.6%
Exceptional
91.9%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.0%
Exceptional
90.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
89.0%
Average
85.8%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.3%
Tragic
62.2%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.2%
Tragic
54.9%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.5%
Tragic
40.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Good
38.5%
Tragic
31.1%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.6%
Tragic
11.9%
Professional Degree
Average
4.5%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Tragic
1.6%

Chinese vs Ottawa Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 50.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 45.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 2.4%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 4.1%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 4.5%).
Chinese vs Ottawa Disability
Disability MetricChineseOttawa
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
14.2%
Males
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
14.1%
Females
Fair
12.3%
Tragic
14.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
6.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
8.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
14.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.7%
Tragic
25.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.7%
Fair
47.6%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.5%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Tragic
3.8%
Cognitive
Exceptional
15.9%
Tragic
18.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
7.2%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.7%