Tsimshian vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,202,367 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Tsimshian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.590. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tsimshian within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.340% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tsimshian corresponds to a decrease of 339.7 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($48,836 compared to $67,353, a difference of 37.9%), per capita income ($40,344 compared to $54,264, a difference of 34.5%), and median earnings ($43,695 compared to $56,638, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,649 compared to $57,931, a difference of 6.0%), wage/income gap (23.9% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 11.7%), and median female earnings ($39,530 compared to $46,972, a difference of 18.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 64.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 21.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (16.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.7%), single mother poverty (26.8% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and female poverty (13.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (13.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 168.6%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (18.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 73.3%), and male unemployment (8.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 61.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.69%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 20.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.4% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 7.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (88.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.56%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.2% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 70.8%), single father households (2.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 56.6%), and divorced or separated (13.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.7% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.35%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.64%), and married-couple households (48.7% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 76.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 10.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 2.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 119.7%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 111.5%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 85.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.6% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 0.30%), nursery school (98.9% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and kindergarten (98.8% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.4% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 150.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 92.3%), and hearing disability (4.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 79.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 2.1%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.1%), and disability age over 75 (59.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 27.8%).