Chinese vs Immigrants from Turkey Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,308,652 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Turkey within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.161. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.048% in Immigrants from Turkey. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 47.8 Immigrants from Turkey.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $66,672, a difference of 16.2%), per capita income ($46,098 compared to $51,368, a difference of 11.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $52,503, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $114,407, a difference of 1.5%), median household income ($98,496 compared to $96,964, a difference of 1.6%), and median family income ($116,188 compared to $118,325, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 32.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 26.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 0.26%), single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 0.51%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 35.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 21.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 10.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.55%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 10.0%), family households (68.1% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 8.0%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.22%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.18, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 56.5%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 39.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 3.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 12.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 33.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 49.8%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 38.2%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.48%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.48%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 33.4%), ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 19.1%), and male disability (12.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 4.2%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 5.1%).