Chinese vs Inupiat Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,037,016 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Inupiat within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.361. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.046% in Inupiat. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 45.8 Inupiat.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $91,355, a difference of 27.2%), householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $61,061, a difference of 26.9%), and median family income ($116,188 compared to $91,730, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $40,080, a difference of 3.5%), householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $55,935, a difference of 4.0%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $43,000, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 105.3%), married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 95.9%), and family poverty (6.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 91.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 17.9%), single father poverty (15.4% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 26.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 39.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 160.4%), male unemployment (4.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 145.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 139.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 39.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 54.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 60.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 10.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.63%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 146.5%), births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 72.3%), and single mother households (5.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 64.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (68.1% compared to 67.8%, a difference of 0.53%), divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.63, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 263.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 42.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 41.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 71.5%, a difference of 28.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 41.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 41.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in associate's degree (48.5% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 49.0%), bachelor's degree (38.5% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 49.0%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 40.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.9% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.040%), 6th grade (97.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.19%), and 5th grade (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 225.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 59.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 36.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.37%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and cognitive disability (15.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 5.9%).