Chinese vs Immigrants from Saudi Arabia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,375,773 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Saudi Arabia within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.029. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Immigrants from Saudi Arabia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 5.9 Immigrants from Saudi Arabia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $46,187, a difference of 25.9%), householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $63,355, a difference of 22.3%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $86,875, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($46,098 compared to $46,008, a difference of 0.19%), median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $56,452, a difference of 0.74%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $47,704, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 56.5%), male poverty (8.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 45.9%), and poverty (9.5% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 44.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 7.9%), single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 10.0%), and single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 18.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 55.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 20.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.75%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 4.6%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.17%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 14.8%), married-couple households (50.4% compared to 44.4%, a difference of 13.4%), and family households (68.1% compared to 60.7%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.23%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 57.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 32.6%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 10.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 25.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 51.8%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 33.0%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.40%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.40%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 34.4%), ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 20.3%), and cognitive disability (15.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.33%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 2.4%).