Chinese vs Immigrants from North Macedonia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,235,474 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from North Macedonia within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.437. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.068% in Immigrants from North Macedonia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 67.9 Immigrants from North Macedonia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $61,175, a difference of 26.6%), median household income ($98,496 compared to $89,741, a difference of 9.8%), and wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($46,098 compared to $45,622, a difference of 1.0%), median earnings ($48,836 compared to $49,658, a difference of 1.7%), and median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $40,488, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 25.9%), married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 25.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 7.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 91.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 26.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.50%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.30%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.0%), births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 7.4%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.16, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (49.5% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 2.1%), divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 54.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 29.9%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 10.5%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 29.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 36.5%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 8.8%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.55%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.55%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 18.8%), male disability (12.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 10.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.040%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 0.69%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.87%).