Guamanian/Chamorro vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 210,089,135 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.705. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guamanians/Chamorros within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.184% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guamanians/Chamorros corresponds to a decrease of 184.4 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,678 compared to $54,264, a difference of 30.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,569 compared to $119,756, a difference of 28.0%), and median male earnings ($53,661 compared to $67,353, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 2.7%), householder income under 25 years ($53,423 compared to $57,931, a difference of 8.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,187 compared to $69,174, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 22.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 21.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.47%), single father poverty (15.1% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and male poverty (11.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 25.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 17.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.28%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.2% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 22.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.7% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 8.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.30%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.78%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 39.7%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 31.4%), and births to unmarried women (31.6% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.1% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.72%), currently married (47.1% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 89.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 33.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 8.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.5% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 17.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 27.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 91.6%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 77.0%), and master's degree (13.1% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 61.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.5% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.22%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.0% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.27%), and high school diploma (88.9% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 40.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 31.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 6.0%), disability age over 75 (49.4% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 6.7%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 10.5%).