Chinese vs Laotian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chinese
Laotian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chinese
Laotians
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,033
SOCIAL INDEX
77.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
91st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Laotian Integration in Chinese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,863,927 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.234. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.077% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 76.7 Laotians.
Chinese vs Laotian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $66,306, a difference of 16.8%), householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $54,369, a difference of 7.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $111,051, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,264 compared to $104,993, a difference of 0.70%), median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $42,133, a difference of 1.6%), and wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 1.8%).
Income Metric | Chinese | Laotian |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,098 | Exceptional $47,041 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $116,188 | Exceptional $112,859 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $98,496 | Exceptional $94,990 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,836 | Exceptional $50,343 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,872 | Exceptional $59,351 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,461 | Exceptional $42,133 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $58,162 | Exceptional $54,369 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,264 | Exceptional $104,993 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $116,156 | Exceptional $111,051 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $77,465 | Exceptional $66,306 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.9% | Poor 26.4% |
Chinese vs Laotian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 35.7%), married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 29.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 2.0%), single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and single male poverty (11.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 8.0%).
Poverty Metric | Chinese | Laotian |
Poverty | Exceptional 9.5% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Exceptional 6.5% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Males | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Exceptional 10.4% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 16.2% | Exceptional 19.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.0% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.1% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.3% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.0% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Single Females | Exceptional 16.1% | Exceptional 19.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 24.6% | Exceptional 27.0% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 8.3% | Good 10.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 9.1% | Fair 12.3% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.8% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Chinese vs Laotian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 39.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 24.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Chinese | Laotian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Exceptional 4.5% | Average 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.7% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.0% | Excellent 17.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Excellent 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Excellent 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Average 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 5.9% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Chinese vs Laotian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 10.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.40%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chinese | Laotian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.7% | Exceptional 65.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.7% | Average 79.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.6% | Tragic 34.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.3% | Tragic 74.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.3% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.1% | Poor 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.1% | Good 82.9% |
Chinese vs Laotian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 13.1%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.9%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.18%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.26, a difference of 2.5%), and family households (68.1% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 3.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Chinese | Laotian |
Family Households | Exceptional 68.1% | Exceptional 65.8% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.0% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 50.4% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.34 | Excellent 3.26 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.5% | Excellent 47.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.2% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Chinese vs Laotian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 19.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 11.0%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.89%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 10.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chinese | Laotian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Exceptional 9.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.9% | Exceptional 91.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.1% | Exceptional 58.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.9% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.8% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Chinese vs Laotian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 50.9%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 30.7%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (68.3% compared to 68.5%, a difference of 0.26%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.76%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.77%).
Education Level Metric | Chinese | Laotian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Poor 2.2% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 97.8% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Poor 97.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Poor 97.8% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.6% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Poor 97.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Poor 96.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Tragic 95.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Tragic 95.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Fair 94.6% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Fair 93.6% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.6% | Average 92.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Good 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Good 89.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.0% | Excellent 86.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.3% | Exceptional 68.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.2% | Exceptional 62.8% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.5% | Exceptional 49.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.5% | Exceptional 42.0% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.6% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.5% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Chinese vs Laotian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 27.2%), ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 14.7%), and male disability (12.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.8%).
Disability Metric | Chinese | Laotian |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Males | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.7% | Exceptional 22.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.7% | Poor 47.9% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Excellent 2.9% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 15.9% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Excellent 2.4% |