Peruvian vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 339,042,905 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Peruvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.171. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Peruvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.049% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Peruvians corresponds to an increase of 48.6 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,479 compared to $54,264, a difference of 22.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,886 compared to $119,756, a difference of 21.1%), and median male earnings ($55,659 compared to $67,353, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($56,052 compared to $57,931, a difference of 3.4%), wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 4.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,766 compared to $69,174, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 22.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.0% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 17.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.010%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and poverty (11.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 20.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 19.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.56%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.75%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 11.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.26%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 29.1%), single father households (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 28.9%), and births to unmarried women (31.5% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.6% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.6%), average family size (3.30 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.2%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 34.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 7.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 4.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 6.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 72.0%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 49.3%), and master's degree (15.3% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 38.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (96.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.010%), 5th grade (96.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.030%), and 4th grade (97.1% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 30.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 17.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.1%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.9%).