Shoshone vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

COMPARE

Shoshone
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from China
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Shoshone

Immigrants from China

Fair
Good
2,256
SOCIAL INDEX
20.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
264th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from China Integration in Shoshone Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,397,959 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Shoshone communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.161. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Shoshone within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.049% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Shoshone corresponds to a decrease of 48.5 Immigrants from China.
Shoshone Integration in Immigrants from China Communities

Shoshone vs Immigrants from China Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,072 compared to $54,264, a difference of 46.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,588 compared to $122,178, a difference of 46.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,062 compared to $119,756, a difference of 45.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 4.9%), householder income under 25 years ($48,720 compared to $57,931, a difference of 18.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,681 compared to $69,174, a difference of 28.9%).
Shoshone vs Immigrants from China Income
Income MetricShoshoneImmigrants from China
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,072
Exceptional
$54,264
Median Family Income
Tragic
$87,872
Exceptional
$125,540
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,660
Exceptional
$105,335
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,932
Exceptional
$56,638
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,930
Exceptional
$67,353
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,677
Exceptional
$46,972
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$48,720
Exceptional
$57,931
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,062
Exceptional
$119,756
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,588
Exceptional
$122,178
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,681
Exceptional
$69,174
Wage/Income Gap
Good
25.4%
Poor
26.7%

Shoshone vs Immigrants from China Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (22.9% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 53.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (20.0% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 46.8%), and single male poverty (16.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 46.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 1.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 7.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.5% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 11.6%).
Shoshone vs Immigrants from China Poverty
Poverty MetricShoshoneImmigrants from China
Poverty
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Tragic
10.9%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Tragic
13.8%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.5%
Average
20.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.2%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.0%
Exceptional
13.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
13.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Exceptional
13.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.9%
Exceptional
13.4%
Single Males
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
11.4%
Single Females
Tragic
25.1%
Exceptional
18.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.9%
Exceptional
14.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
32.9%
Exceptional
26.1%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.1%
Excellent
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
11.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
13.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Poor
12.4%
Exceptional
9.6%

Shoshone vs Immigrants from China Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 111.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 54.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 49.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.3% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 10.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 10.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 11.8%).
Shoshone vs Immigrants from China Unemployment
Unemployment MetricShoshoneImmigrants from China
Unemployment
Tragic
6.8%
Good
5.2%
Males
Tragic
7.6%
Good
5.2%
Females
Tragic
6.2%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.7%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.3%
Good
17.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.7%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.6%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.2%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.9%
Poor
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Good
8.6%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
6.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.9%

Shoshone vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.3% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 26.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.3% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 3.7%).
Shoshone vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricShoshoneImmigrants from China
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.2%
Excellent
65.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.8%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.3%
Tragic
31.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.1%
Tragic
71.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.6%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.4%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.2%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.3%
Exceptional
83.2%

Shoshone vs Immigrants from China Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (35.3% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 43.0%), single father households (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 42.0%), and divorced or separated (14.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 39.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.8% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.4%), family households with children (26.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 3.5%), and average family size (3.37 compared to 3.23, a difference of 4.5%).
Shoshone vs Immigrants from China Family Structure
Family Structure MetricShoshoneImmigrants from China
Family Households
Tragic
63.8%
Excellent
64.7%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.5%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.9%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.37
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.0%
Exceptional
47.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
10.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
35.3%
Exceptional
24.7%

Shoshone vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 46.6%), no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 40.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 36.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 5.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 12.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 36.7%).
Shoshone vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricShoshoneImmigrants from China
No Vehicles Available
Fair
10.8%
Tragic
15.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Fair
89.5%
Tragic
84.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.9%
Tragic
51.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
24.9%
Tragic
18.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Poor
6.0%

Shoshone vs Immigrants from China Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 123.2%), professional degree (3.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 103.4%), and master's degree (11.1% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 90.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.5% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.26%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.89%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.90%).
Shoshone vs Immigrants from China Education Level
Education Level MetricShoshoneImmigrants from China
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.0%
Tragic
2.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
97.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
96.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
96.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Tragic
95.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Tragic
95.0%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
94.3%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.2%
Tragic
93.2%
11th Grade
Average
92.5%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.5%
Good
91.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
88.3%
Good
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.7%
Exceptional
86.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.1%
Exceptional
70.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.3%
Exceptional
66.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.4%
Exceptional
55.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
29.3%
Exceptional
48.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.1%
Exceptional
21.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
6.7%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
3.1%

Shoshone vs Immigrants from China Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 68.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 66.2%), and hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 53.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 2.1%), disability age over 75 (49.9% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 7.6%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.7%).
Shoshone vs Immigrants from China Disability
Disability MetricShoshoneImmigrants from China
Disability
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
10.1%
Males
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
0.96%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Average
5.6%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.8%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.5%
Exceptional
8.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
20.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.9%
Exceptional
46.3%
Vision
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Tragic
4.0%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.3%