Chinese vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,642,851 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kazakhstan within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.533. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.051% in Immigrants from Kazakhstan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 51.5 Immigrants from Kazakhstan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $62,292, a difference of 24.4%), median household income ($98,496 compared to $91,015, a difference of 8.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $107,378, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 0.47%), median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $42,386, a difference of 2.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,264 compared to $101,727, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 43.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 42.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 1.1%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 11.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 13.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 38.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 18.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 4.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 9.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.31%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.4%), family households (68.1% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 8.1%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 2.2%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 64.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 60.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 37.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 6.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 51.6%, a difference of 16.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 37.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 43.1%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 28.4%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.63%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.65%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 25.3%), male disability (12.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 12.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.3%).